Life - Why homosexuality is wrong..
While googling for a gadget, I end up here http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/56725
Basically the article is about a man who wrote that homosexuality was wrong because the Bible said so.
Someone else wrote back this:
"
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 If a bride is found not to be a virgin, the Bible demands that she be executed on the spot by stoning.
How can one part of Bible be deemed to be carved in stone when other parts have been dismissed as archaic?
"
Valid point in my view. Most religions condemn homosexuality. Sadly today it is accepted, and admired even by some. It is a trend. Be open-minded, they tell us.
Let us leave religion aside, and I will tell you why in my view homosexuality is wrong.
Let us imagine that mankind existed only 2000 years ago. And there were only 100 men and 100 woman living then. All ready to mate. But being primitive, they thought that they can only mate with the same sex. (I am not sure how the female would have done it then).
Move forward 150 years from that date. Would there be a new generation of children and grandchildren? Basically, to keep this community alive, they would have to restore to natural sex (call it whatever you want) which is between male and female.
It is a hypothetical example, but it is an example nevertheless.
... end of part 1
Basically the article is about a man who wrote that homosexuality was wrong because the Bible said so.
Someone else wrote back this:
"
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 If a bride is found not to be a virgin, the Bible demands that she be executed on the spot by stoning.
How can one part of Bible be deemed to be carved in stone when other parts have been dismissed as archaic?
"
Valid point in my view. Most religions condemn homosexuality. Sadly today it is accepted, and admired even by some. It is a trend. Be open-minded, they tell us.
Let us leave religion aside, and I will tell you why in my view homosexuality is wrong.
Let us imagine that mankind existed only 2000 years ago. And there were only 100 men and 100 woman living then. All ready to mate. But being primitive, they thought that they can only mate with the same sex. (I am not sure how the female would have done it then).
Move forward 150 years from that date. Would there be a new generation of children and grandchildren? Basically, to keep this community alive, they would have to restore to natural sex (call it whatever you want) which is between male and female.
It is a hypothetical example, but it is an example nevertheless.
... end of part 1
posted by TheSadArab at 4:45 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home